Vol. III, No. 1 Autumn 2026

International Journal of Forgery Studies

Vol. III, No. 1
Autumn 2026
Leiden

The International Journal of Forgery Studies is a peer-reviewed journal on the making, detection, and study of forgeries — forged texts and documents, invented histories, and fabricated news. It appears twice yearly, published by the International Society for Forgery Studies.

Submit a manuscript → Submissions open year-round

Current Issue

Contents

  1. Attribution of questioned handwriting increasingly rests on comparison against large digitised script corpora. This article examines three attribution exercises in which corpus-based likelihood ratios and expert judgement diverged, and asks what the corpus can and cannot warrant. We argue that corpus evidence constrains, but does not replace, the examiner’s account of a hand’s habitual movement.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 1–24

  2. A forged descent is rarely a lie about one family alone. Drawing on fourteen genealogical fabrications compiled between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries, this article sets out what such documents were for, who accepted them, and how the claim survived long after the parchment was doubted.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 25–41

  3. Examination reports from the last four decades record more than sixty attempts to make new paper read as old: staining, controlled foxing, artificial worm damage, and mechanical wear at the fold. Surveyed together, they show which signs of age forgers imitate first, and which they consistently neglect.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 42–63

  4. The Rotterdam forgery trial (1998–2003) placed paper evidence before a criminal court for the first time in a Dutch documentary prosecution. This article reconstructs the watermark testimony from the trial record and follows each of the three documents into the later technical literature, where two of the datings have quietly changed.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 64–79

  5. Laboratory reports enter historical argument as facts, but they arrive shaped by the questions they were asked. Proposing a protocol for citing technical findings, this article treats the report as a genre with conventions, limits, and a rhetoric of its own.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 80–97

  6. Official seals certified the authenticity of Joseon administrative documents, and their counterfeiting was a capital crime. Reading legal case records alongside surviving forgeries, this article traces how seal verification was practised, taught, and occasionally defeated in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 98–116

  7. Large documentary hoaxes are usually explained by the skill of the forger. This article reverses the account, reading the press files of a twentieth-century case to show how editors, authenticators, and buyers each narrowed their own question until no one held the one that would have exposed it.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 117–130

  8. The first instalment of a running register: sixty-three charters carrying later interpolations, with repository, hand, and the earliest record of each doubt. Corrections and additions are invited and will be acknowledged in the next instalment.

    IJFS III.1 (Autumn 2026): pp. 131–136

End of contents · Vol. III, No. 1 · pp. 1–136 · Leiden, Autumn 2026